don't complain about concurrent flagging as deleted

the result of propagating a deletion is flagging as deleted, so shut up
if the only remote change is exactly that.
This commit is contained in:
Oswald Buddenhagen 2021-12-01 11:25:06 +01:00
parent 51673214ab
commit e686f88318

View File

@ -1696,7 +1696,11 @@ box_loaded( int sts, message_t *msgs, int total_msgs, int recent_msgs, void *aux
JLOG( "> %u %u 0", (srec->uid[F], srec->uid[N]), "near side expired, orphaning far side" );
srec->uid[N] = 0;
} else {
if (srec->msg[t] && (srec->msg[t]->status & M_FLAGS) && srec->msg[t]->flags != srec->flags)
if (srec->msg[t] && (srec->msg[t]->status & M_FLAGS) &&
// Ignore deleted flag, as that's what we'll change ourselves ...
(((srec->msg[t]->flags & ~F_DELETED) != (srec->flags & ~F_DELETED)) ||
// ... except for undeletion, as that's the opposite.
(!(srec->msg[t]->flags & F_DELETED) && (srec->flags & F_DELETED))))
notice( "Notice: conflicting changes in (%u,%u)\n", srec->uid[F], srec->uid[N] );
if (svars->chan->ops[t] & OP_DELETE) {
debug( " %sing delete\n", str_hl[t] );