tune SASL-related comments
- add explanations to the callbacks - remove bogus comment - EXTERNAL can be in fact missing (when no authentication id is set)
This commit is contained in:
parent
e295f483d9
commit
c2e6e962b5
|
@ -2115,8 +2115,8 @@ process_sasl_interact( sasl_interact_t *interact, imap_server_conf_t *srvc )
|
|||
switch (interact->id) {
|
||||
case SASL_CB_LIST_END:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
case SASL_CB_USER:
|
||||
case SASL_CB_AUTHNAME:
|
||||
case SASL_CB_USER: // aka authorization id - who to act as
|
||||
case SASL_CB_AUTHNAME: // who is really logging in
|
||||
val = ensure_user( srvc );
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case SASL_CB_PASS:
|
||||
|
@ -2366,7 +2366,7 @@ imap_open_store_authenticate2( imap_store_t *ctx )
|
|||
return;
|
||||
notsasl:
|
||||
if (!ctx->sasl || sasl_listmech( ctx->sasl, NULL, "", " ", "", &saslavail, NULL, NULL ) != SASL_OK)
|
||||
saslavail = "(none)"; /* EXTERNAL is always there anyway. */
|
||||
saslavail = "(none)";
|
||||
if (!auth_login) {
|
||||
error( "IMAP error: selected SASL mechanism(s) not available;\n"
|
||||
" selected:%s\n available: %s\n", saslmechs, saslavail );
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user